UN docs


Economic and Social
11 August 1993
Original: FRENCH

Fiftieth session,
Item 12 of the provisional agenda


Extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions

Report by Mr. B.W. Ndiaye. Special Rapporteur, on his mission to Rwanda from 8 to 17 April 1993

1 - 5
6 - 11
12 - 24
25 - 43
  A. Types of Violations
28 - 31
1. Massacres of the civilian population
2. Death threats and “political” assassinations
3. Death Penalty
30 - 31
 [page 2] B. Persons responsible for violations
32 - 43
    1. Violations attributable to the Rwandese armed forces
33 - 36
    2. Violations attributable to local government officials
37 - 38
    3. Violations attributable to other government officials
    4. Violations attributable to political party militias
    5. Violations attributable to clandestine organizations
    6. Violations attributable to private individuals
    7. Violations attributable to the Rwandese Patriotic Front
A. Absence of the rule of law
44 - 58
  1. Tradition of impunity
45 - 46
  2.  Judicial system
47 - 54
B. Absence of any system for the protection of ethnic minorities
C. Injurious propaganda
56 - 58
59 - 86
1. Mechanism for the protection of civilian populations against massacres
64 - 66
2.  Support for Rwandese non-governmental organizations directly involved in the protection of human rights
[page 3] 3. National reconciliation campaign
4. Media-related action
69 - 70
5. Reform of the Rwandese judicial system
6. Death penalty
7. Impartial and objective inquiry into the allegations of massacres committed by the Rwandese Patriotic Front
8. Dismantling of all violent organizations 
9. Combating impunity and compensating victims
75 - 76
10. Ending arbitrary arrests and detentions
11. The genocide question
78 - 81
12. Additional measures for protecting the right to life and restoring a lasting peace 
82 - 86
I.Map of Rwanda
II.Statement by the Government of Rwanda concerning the final report of the international Commission of Inquiry on human rights violations in Rwanda since 1 October 1990 
III. Principles on the Effective Prevention and investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and
Summary Executions
[page 4] Introduction

1. In recent years, Rwanda has attracted the attention of the human rights protection mechanisms established by the Commission on Human Rights. Reference was thus made to the human rights situation in that country in several reports submitted to the Commission at its forty-ninth session; of particular relevance is the information contained in the report of the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture (E/CN.4/1993/26, paras. 386 to 390), and in that Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances. (E/CN.4/1993/25, paras. 441 to 446).

2. Mr. Wako, the previous Special Rapporteur, included allegations of violations of the right to life in Rwanda in his report to the commission at its forty-eighth session (E/CN.4/1992/30, paras. 461 to 467). During 1992, the current Special Rapporteur received reports and allegations relating to extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions of unarmed civilians by the Rwandese security forces in connection with the armed conflict between government security forces and the Rwandese Patriotic Front (FPR) since October 1990. He also received information concerning killings of members of the Tutsi minority, in particular the Bagogwe clan, allegedly perpetrated with direct or indirect involvement of the security forces; those alleged violations of the right to life concerned at least 172 persons in 1992. On 25 September 1992, the Special Rapporteur sent an urgent appeal to the Government of Rwanda after receiving reports about death threats and acts of harassment against a member of a human rights group; the latter had conducted inquiries whose findings pointed to the involvement of local government officials in mass killings of members of the Bagogwe clan. These allegations are contained in the report submitted to the Commission on Human Rights at its forty-ninth session (E/CN.4/1993/46, paras. 502 to 504).

3. At the beginning of 1993, Rwandese human rights organizations invited the Special Rapporteur to take part in an international commission of inquiry into violations of human rights in Rwanda. The Special Rapporteur had to decline the invitation in the belief that, since there was a State system in Rwanda, it was for the authorities of that country to conduct inquires and report on measures taken, the Rapporteur's role being confined, in the circumstances, to observing the manner in which the competent authorities were meeting their commitments in regard to protection of human rights. He asked, however, to be kept informed of the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the international commission of inquiry.

4. On 8 February 1993, the FPR breached the cease-fire agreement concluded on 12 July 1992 during the Arusha (Tanzania) peace negotiations. It was in that context that serious allegations were brought to the attention of the Special Rapporteur. On 15 February. 1993, an urgent appeal was sent to the Rwandese Government following reports of a resumption of the killings and of reprisals and acts of intimidation against persons who had collaborated with or testified before the International Commission of Inquiry on violations of human rights in Rwanda since I October 1990 (referred to hereinafter as "the International commission of inquiry") . This Commission, which visited Rwanda from 7 to 21 January 1993, was composed of 10 experts mandated by the International Federation of Human Rights (Paris), Africa Watch (New York), the Union interafricaine des droits de l’homme et des peuples (Ouagadougou), [page 5] and the International Centre for the Rights of the Person and Democratic Development (Montreal) . It was these disturbing allegations that prompted the Special Rapporteur, on 1 March 1993, to request an invitation from the President of the Rwandese Republic to visit Rwanda so that he could have personal talks with the Rwandese authorities and with individuals, associations and non-governmental organizations involved in the protection of human rights, and assess the situation at first hand.

5. On 8 March 1993, the President of the Rwandese Republic kindly complied with that request by inviting the Special Rapporteur to visit Rwanda. The report of the International Commission of inquiry was made public on the same date.


6. Because of the shortage of time and of material and human resources available to the Special Rapporteur (he stayed only about 10 days, from 8 to 17 April 1993), there was no question of undertaking an in-depth fact-finding or verification mission, which would have entailed, inter alia, substantial logistic and scientific resources; for example, experts in forensic medicine would have been needed to verify the existence of mass graves.

7. The work of the Special Rapporteur was greatly facilitated by the considerable amount of information which was brought to his attention by various human rights organizations, both Rwandese and international, and which was on the whole sufficiently convincing and precise to be taken into account. Special mention should be made here of the report of the International Commission of inquiry, which the Special Rapporteur was able to use as his main working document because of its methodical and specific nature and the diversity and consistency of the testimony it contains. The report of the International Commission of inquiry gives an idea of the scale of Rwanda's problems as regards human rights in general and extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions in particular. It goes in detail into the mechanisms behind the massacres and describes the methods used by the perpetrators of violations; it also clearly identifies those responsible for violating the right to life.

8. On 7 April 1993, just after the Special Rapporteur had arrived in Rwanda, the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister (the latter after having his roots in the Republican Democratic Movement (MDR, the main opposition party)) issued a joint statement on the report of the International Commission of inquiry (hereinafter referred to as the "Joint Statement"; see annex II) in this document, the authors recognize the substance of the allegations contained in the report. In particular, they acknowledge and regret that there have been massacres of civilian populations and also that certain Rwandese authorities bear some share of responsibility. The justifications given are as follows: shortcomings in the judicial system and failure of certain authorities adequately to ensure the security of persons and their property, "uncontrolled behaviour" by certain undisciplined members of the armed forces, and the existence of criminal organizations. The facts denounced by the report are therefore recognized, even though the Joint Statement is critical of the methods of the International Commission of Inquiry, especially the lack of balance between denunciations levelled at [page 6] the authorities and those aimed at the FPR, and the fact that the persons accused of human rights violations were not heard by the investigators. The Commission of inquiry is also reproached for not having drawn the attention of the international community sufficiently to the critical situation of persons displaced by war, and for giving the impression that human rights violations in Rwanda are directed against a particular ethnic group. The Joint Statement concludes with a series of recommendations along the same lines as those contained in the report of the International Commission of Inquiry.

9. After cross-checking, the Special Rapporteur concluded that the substance of the allegations contained in the Commission's report could, by and large, be regarded as established. He none the less proceeded to collect information on events after the report.

10. During his mission, the Special Rapporteur was received by the President of the Republic, the Prime minister and several members of the Government, and also met a large number of representatives of the Rwandese civilian and military authorities. He also had talks with the diplomatic representatives of several countries, with the commander of the group of neutral military observers of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) (which is supervising the observance of the cease-fire agreement between the two warring parties), and with the leaders of political parties represented in the transition Government. Many discussions were held with the representatives of all the Rwandese human rights organizations, and with witnesses and victims of human rights violations. A large number of other persons from various walks of life also made an invaluable contribution to the Special Rapporteur's mission. In addition, the Special Rapporteur met the Chairman of the FPR’s military operations, who is also the Vice-Chairman of the organization, and several other of its senior officials.

11.  He visited camps for displaced persons, both around Kigali and in the area controlled by the FPR forces. He made a brief visit to the prefecture of Gisenyi, a region which numerous allegations, reported to the Special Rapporteur had indicated as being the scene of massacres of civilians. He also visited a prison and two military camps in Kigali.


12. Rwanda, a small central African State with a surface area of 26,338 km2 and a population of over 7 million, is the most densely populated country in the world after Bangladesh. Its economy, primarily agricultural, relies to a great extent on international development aid. The country's precarious economic situation has deteriorated even further as a result of the fall in the price of coffee and the armed conflict with the FPR, which has been going an since October 1990. A structural adjustment programme undertaken at the prompting of the World Bank and the international Monetary Fund (IMF) was also launched at that time.

13. The population of Rwanda is divided into three ethnic groups - the Hutu (85 per cent), the Tutsi (14 per cent) and the Twa (1 per cent); these three ethnic groups speak the same language and share the same culture. Children of mixed marriages belong to the father's ethnic group. Traditionally, the Hutu [page 7] are farmers, whereas the Tutsi are stockbreeders. In the past, transition from one group to another was possible: a Hutu acquiring a large number of head of cattle could be assimilated into the Tutsi group, and a Tutsi who lost his cattle could be regarded as a Hutu. Later, the Belgian colonial authorities, basing their action on divisions among the Rwandese, required the ethnic group to be specified on identity cards. From then on, membership of an ethnic group was strictly defined for administrative purposes and social categories became increasingly rigid.

14. The Tutsi dominated the country's political and economic life until 1959, when the Hutu "social revolution" put an end to the monarchy. The Twa, for their part, have always been and still are regarded by the vast majority of the Rwandese as being outside the economic and social mainstream of Rwanda.

15. The country was a German colony from 1894 to 1916 and was then placed by the League of Nations, and subsequently the United Nations, under Belgian trusteeship, from 1918 to 1962.

16. After the 1959 "social revolution" and the ensuing ethnic violence, a large number of Tutsi left Rwanda and sought refuge in neighbouring countries. They repeatedly attempted to stage an armed come-back. There were about 10 such attempts until 1967, and each of them gave rise to renewed ethnic violence and retaliation, with the slaughter and flight of civilians that that entailed. For example, between 10,000 and 14,000 Tutsi are estimated to have been killed during the 1963 massacres.

17. In 1973, when ethnic unrest and violence were at their height, Major General Juvénal Habyarimana seized power in a military coup d'état. He founded the second Republic, a regime dominated by the single party set up by the President, the National Revolutionary Movement for Democracy and Development (MRND). About 50 political leaders from the previous regime are reported to have been done away with following the coup d'état. Previous practices of ethnic discrimination were institutionalized during this period through a policy known as "establishing ethnic and regional balance", whereby a very substantial part of the country's political and social life became subject to quotas established according to "ethnic proportions" and determining the posts and resources allocated to the various ethnic groups (10 per cent for the Tutsi). This policy, which precludes any prime consideration of competence, is to this day a determining factor in the social, political and administrative life of the Rwandese (access to jobs, posts in the administration, education, etc.). In fact, this percentage system reflects a conception of democracy based on government by the ethnic majority rather than by the political majority.

18. As from 1973, regional rivalries were added to this ethnic antagonism, with the north, the home region of the President of the Republic, enjoying privileges in relation to the rest of the country.

19. It was against this background of relatively non-violent ethic and regional rivalries, and a few months after the announcement by the President of the Republic that the country would soon be opened up to multi-party rule and democratization, that a devastating attck was launched in October 1990 by the FPR, an armed force consisting mainly of Tutsi refugees outside Rwanda, [page 8] many of them former members of the Ugandan armed forces. The result of this attack and of a policy of deliberately-targeted government propaganda was that all Tutsi inside the country were collectively labelled accomplices of the FPR. It was this linkage, the ensuing climate and the directives which followed that triggered the massacres of civilians described in this report.

20. Many of the people to whom the Special Rapporteur spoke pointed out that the return of the 400,000 to 500,000 refugees from abroad would cause a number of problems. Firstly, as has been mentioned, Rwanda is the most densely populated country in Africa and there has long since been no land to spare. In addition to this, certain Hutu businessmen are afraid that the Tutsi who have made their fortune in the countries receiving them are coming back to resume control of the Rwandese economy, thereby reasserting their domination. There is also a widespread belief that the FPR and the Tutsi in general want to re-establish the pre-1959 "feudal monarchistic" system. Although the majority of the population consider that it is possible for the two main ethnic groups to live together peacefully, there is a certain elite which, in order to cling to power, is continuing to fuel ethnic hatred, for instance by spreading rumours prejudicial to the Tutsi. The FPR is often identified with the Tutsi ethnic group. It should also be noted that some members of the opposition parties, though Hutu themselves, have been accused of being traitors to their country by Hutu extremists (such as the members of the Coalition for the Defence of the Republic (CDR) party, a radical offshoot of the MRND) because of their opposition to the Government in power and their attempts to enter into a dialogue with the FPR.

21. Since 16 April 1992, four opposition parties (Republican Democratic Movement, Liberal Party, Christian Democrat Party and Social Democrat Party) have held half of the ministerial posts and the post of Head of the Government, and have been endeavouring to participate in the running of the country's affairs. Under the Constitution of 10 June 1991, however, real power remains vested in the President of the Republic, who controls the army, the police force and most of the local government. The result of this is that action by the Prime Minister and some of his ministers is often obstructed by MRND representatives in the Government.

22. A climate of mistrust and terror currently prevails in Rwanda. Although rumour is largely responsible for this situation, violence is none the less a feature of everyday life. There is an alarming increase in crime, fuelled by the profusion of weapons in circulation (in Kigali a grenade can be bought for less than US $2) and the destitute condition of a whole sector of the population, exacerbated by displacements of the population as a result of the war. But the prevalence of crime is also sometimes used to cover up acts of political violence. There are several cases of murder or attempted murder of political opponents, journalists or troublesome witnesses that have been passed off as ordinary crimes. The situation has become particularly explosive with the distribution of weapons to civilians by the authorities, officially to combat the forces of the PPR, an example being in the municipality of Mutura, where 193 guns were distributed in February 1993. This is compounded by the danger of the mines laid by the warring parties, which all too often kill or maim innocent civilians, especially children.

[page 9] 23. This report would not be complete without a reference to one of the most tragic consequences of the present situation in Rwanda - the displacement of populations within the country. Before the violation of the cease-fire agreement by the FPR on 8 February 1993, 350,000 persons had already fled in terror from the combat zones and the areas of intercommunal violence, leaving behind them all their possessions and their lands, situated mainly in the northern, most fertile region of the country. Since then, the number of displaced persons has risen to 900,000 and possibly 1million. This means that almost one in seven Rwandese has been displaced by war. An unknown number of displaced persons are also living in the area held by the FPR on the border with Uganda in the north of the country. Some of them have reportedly been deported to that country. To these must be added an indeterminate number of persons who, as a result of local acts of violence whose presumed perpetrators are still at large, live in a permanent state of terror and dare not move back into their homes, cultivating their fields in the daytime and spending the night in the open or with members of their families.

24. The displaced persons, among them a high proportion of children, live a precarious life of hardship in overcrowded makeshift camps and depend on massive external food aid (13 tonnes a month) for their survival. According to information provided by one of the humanitarian organizations working there, cases of severe malnutrition have already been identified among children under the age of five. The deplorably unhygienic conditions in which they live have also caused epidemics of dysentery. According to forecasts brought to the attention of the Special Rapporteur, the next harvest could be down by 40 per cent as a result of the exodus from the fertile lands situated in the combat areas. This catastrophic situation might therefore lead to famine. The question of the displaced persons is nothing short of a time-bomb with potentially tragic consequences if it is not resolved quickly principally by a return to peace and the arrest of the instigators of the massacres. It is regrettable that the misfortune of these war victims should be used by both warring parties as a political weapon in their struggle for power and in the Arusha peace negotiations.


25. Rwanda has acceded to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but has not ratified the first and second optional protocols. The provisions of the Covenant form part of domestic law and take precedence in the event of conflict with another provision of domestic law. Rwanda is also a party to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and the Protocol thereto. In addition, Rwanda is a party to the four Geneva Conventions and to their additional protocols. On the other hand, the country is not yet a party to the Convention against Torture.

26. For its part, the FPR has stated to the International Committee of the Red Cross that it considers itself bound by the rules of international humanitarian law.

[page 10] 27. It has been reported that between October 1990 and January 1993, at least 2,000 civilians have been victims of extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Since 8 February 1993, the date on which the FPR violated the cease-fire agreement concluded at Arusha, at least 300 Tutsi and political opponents are said to have been killed, mainly in the prefectures of Gisenyi, Ruhengeri, Kibuye and Byumba.

A. Types of violations

1. Massacres of civilian Populations
28. Massacres of civilian populations have been perpetrated either by the Rwandese security forces or by certain sectors of the population. Killings have taken place not only in the combat zones during or after clashes, but also in areas situated some distance from the hostilities. In the latter case, it has been shown time and time again that government officials were involved, either directly by encouraging, planning, directing or participating in the violence, or indirectly through incompetence, negligence or deliberate inaction. The number of victims has sometimes reached tragic proportion, as for example in Kibilira, where at least 348 persons were said to have been killed in 48 hours shortly after the outbreak of war in October 1990. Massacres have also been attributed to the FPR.

2. Death threats and “political” assassinations
29. These methods have been used to intimidate or eliminate the regime's opponents (politicians, journalists, etc.), witnesses of human rights violations, or human rights activists. Such violations of the right to life have sometimes been committed by government officials. They can also frequently be attributed to the militias of two parties, the MRND and the Coalition for the Defence of the Republic (CDR), or to clandestine armed groups allegedly close to the party in power. The techniques used include poisoning, faked robbery and death threats. It should be noted that such practices are also aimed at the Hutu and are still being used at the time of writing of the present report.

3. Death penalty
30. Hundreds of people have been sentenced to death in Rwanda. At the time of the special Rapporteur's visit to Kigali prison, 205 prisoners, 29 of them women, were awaiting execution. It should be noted, however, that no death sentence has been ordered since 1982. In view of the gross shortcomings of the judicial system, described below, it is to be feared that these persons have not had a fair trial, notably in so far as the competence, independence and impartiality of the courts are concerned. In most cases it is also to be feared that the rights of defence have not been respected.

31. As to death sentences passed by the FPR on members of its own forces, the Special Rapporteur was unable to determine what guarantees were provided to ensure that innocent men did not end up facing a firing squad.

[page 11] B. Persons responsible for violations

32. It is sometimes difficult to form a clear picture of the-situation where responsibility for violations of the right to life is concerned.   indeed, in many cases, it cannot be attributed to any single person or group, since it has frequently been noted that those committing the violations have been manipulated or directed by some higher authority.

1 . Violations attributable to the Rwandese armed forces
33. After the beginning of the armed conflict in October 1990, the Rwandese Armed Forces (FAR) carried out a massive and hurried recruitment campaign, increasing their numbers from 5,000 to 40,000 men in the space of a few months. The undue haste with which recruits were selected and instructed had negative repercussions on the discipline of the combatants and on their training in the rules of war. These inadequacies, combined with the low wages received by the soldiers, facilitated the crimes committed by the FAR, such as the endemic practice of raping Tutsi women (cases of 12-year-old rape victims have been reported, their young age being regarded as a protection against AIDS), looting, armed attacks, revenge killings and murders of civilians, both within and outside the combat zones.

34. Cases of summary executions by the FARhave also been reported; they have notably concerned non-combatant soldiers of the FPR or civilians suspected of being the latter's accomplices, who have been arrested by soldiers and killed in military camps. At the time of the Special Rapporteur's visit to the camps in Kigali and Kanombe, the camp commanders categorically denied the existence of such practice. on the other hand, they both gave similar accounts of incidents said to have taken place in the two camps: men arrested on suspicion of being enemy agents had been killed on entering the camp by war amputees wielding crutches after the soldiers escorting the suspects had failed to intervene.

35. The FAR have also played an active and well-planned role at the highest level in certain cases of killings of Tutsi by the population, notably with respect to massacres targeting the Bagogwe: for instance, soldiers of Bigogwe camp (Mutura Commune) are said to have organized fake attacks by rebels during the night of 4 February 1991, so that they could then unleash indiscriminate and bloody reprisals against those alleged to be responsible. The FAR are also accused of incitement to murder and of giving logistic support to the killers. There have also been occasions, for example in the case of the massacres at Bugesera in March 1992, when soldiers disarmed the Tutsi so that they would be unable to defend themselves against their attackers, or prevented populations under threat of violence from fleeing the area by setting up roadblocks.

36. The FAR's involvement in the killings has been confirmed by numerous reliable witnesses, and even by the findings of a commission set up by the Government on 15 September 1992 to investigate allegations of massacres in the prefecture of Kibungo. It should be noted that these findings have not resulted in the imposition of any penalties on the accused military personnel.

[page 12] 2 . Violations attributable to local government officials
37. The role of such officials (prefects, sub-prefects, mayors, councillors, sector leaders or cell leaders) in the massacres of civilian populations consists chiefly in encouraging, planning and directing the operation, and in some cases actually participating in it. In fact, there are numerous well-documented reports to the effect that certain mayors have spread unfounded rumours exacerbating ethnic hatred and have encouraged the population to massacre Tutsi people. In some cases, such officials have facilitated the task of those perpetrating the massacres by supplying them with equipment, such as vehicles or fuel. On many occasions, the authorities have not intervened to prevent such action and have not taken any steps to stop killings of civilians by a mob (see sect. 6, para. 42 below) .

38. Although the attitude and behaviour of certain mayors and other local officials has been criminal, it should be noted that others have shown courage and refused to take any part in the massacres. Many of them have paid for it later by being censured, transferred or dismissed, and some have even received death threats.

3 . Violations attributable to other government officials
39. It has been noted that the prison authorities do not provide any medicines for prisoners, on the pretext that they must pay for them themselves. If the latter are poor or have no family to help them, they do not receive proper treatment. Deaths in prison in suspicious circumstances have also been reported.

4 .Violations attributable to political Party militias
40. Youth organizations of some political parties have been converted into militias, sometimes armed, and used in the struggle for power. This has resulted in brawls and armed confrontations. In addition, it has been
reported on numerous occasions that two of these militias, those of the MRND and the CDR, have been guilty of incitement to ethnic violence against the Tutsi, of massacres of civilian populations and of political assassinations. In a few well-documented cases, it has been shown that members of these militias have been backed by plain-clothes members of the FARand by representatives of the local authorities. In any event, it would seem that such militias have been able to commit their misdeeds and impose a reign of terror with complete impunity. For instance, they have succeeded in setting up roadblocks, in complete defiance of the law, without being in any way troubled by security forces in the vicinity. It has also been reported that these militias have been trained by members of the Presidential Guard and by members of the armed forces. It has been suggested that this state of affairs
is the result of efforts by certain authorities to "privatize" violence by channelling it through such groups, so as to avoid being held responsible for the massacres. It has also been reported that the MRND and CDR militias have recruited children and displaced persons and made them take part in violent demonstrations in return for payment.

[page 13] 5. Violations attributable to clandestine organizations
41. The existence of "death squads" is the subject of much argument in Rwanda, particularly since the close entourage of the Head of State, and even the President himself, have been explicitly accused of being involved in a clandestine organization known as "Network Zero". It has been reported that the objective of such groups is to get rid of troublesome individuals in order to create a climate of terror and insecurity, thus discrediting democratic reforms, the multi-party system and the peace process initiated at Arusha. Methods used are said to include assassinations of the regime's opponents (notably by poisoning, terrorist attacks or faked robberies), and provoking bloody riots and confrontations, sometimes in collaboration with the militias of parties close to those in power, plain-clothes members of the armed forces or representatives of the authorities. Several observers accuse such groups of being responsible for the planning of massacres of one part of the population by another. Unfortunately, there is little first-hand and reliable evidence to corroborate these allegations. There are nevertheless sufficient indications to enable the Special Rapporteur to conclude that a second power exists alongside that of the official authorities.

6. Violations attributable to private individuals
42. The Rwandese population, 95 per cent of whom are farmers, are for the most part peace-loving. Nevertheless, the worst killings can be attributed to "out-of-control" mobs of Hutu peasants. Most of the massacres are the result of ethnic violence, said to be deliberately fomented by certain individuals allegedly close to those in power. A study of the phases preceding outbreaks of violence among the population shows that such outbreaks were planned and prepared, with targets being identified in speeches by representatives of the authorities, broadcasts on Rwandese radio and leaflets. It is also noteworthy that at the time of the violence, the persons perpetrating the massacres were under organized leadership. In this connection, local government officials have been found to play a leading role in most cases (see sect. 2, para. 37, above). This analysis appears to be confirmed by the fact that the disturbances very often follow the lines of local boundaries, depending on whether or not the authorities are involved. The fact that the attacks are simultaneous, and that the rumours spread are similar, would also suggest the existence of an organization not confined to a single commune. The above remarks should not obscure the fact that under cover of the ethnic disturbances some settling of scores between neighbours or murders accompanied by robbery may have taken place. The fact remains that such crimes, which were usually directed against the Tutsi, have also gone unpunished; the persons arrested after the violence have been quickly released without being made to stand trial.

7. Violations attributable to the Rwandese Patriotic Front
43. A number of alleged violations of the right to life attributable to forces of the Rwandese Patriotic Front (PPR) have been brought to the attention of the Special Rapporteur. Although several accusations of massacres of civilian populations levelled against the FPR are lacking in credibility, the fact remains that reliable sources have revealed that the FPR has in fact perpetrated executions in the areas under its control. For [page 14] instance, it has been reported that, following the resumption of hostilities by the FPR on 8 February 1993, 8 representatives of the authorities and at least l00 civilians were summarily executed; members of the MRND and the CDR were said to have been specially singled out. In view of the lack of information concerning the situation on the ground, and in the light of the inaccessibility of the area in question and the limited time available to the Special Rapporteur, it was extremely difficult for him to form a personal opinion on the matter during his mission to Rwanda. On the other hand, he was able to meet reliable individuals who convinced him that these summary executions did actually take place. It is accordingly important that a more extensive investigation should be held, covering not only the areas under FPR control, but also certain border regions situated in Ugandan territory. Such an investigation could be carried out by an international team of experts providing every guarantee of independence and impartiality, such as the team which visited Rwanda in January 1993. The contacts which the Special Rapporteur had in Rwanda with the FPR indicate that the latter would be willing to receive a fact-finding mission of this kind.


A. Absence of the rule of law

44. The absence of the rule of law seems to be deliberate. In fact, there is a striking contrast between, on the one hand, the close control exercised over the population and the detailed partitioning of the territory (to such an extent that a residence permit is required simply to change prefectures) , and, on the other, the absence of any structure for the protection of vulnerable populations, more particularly the Tutsi minority. In fact, no effective system for preventing and punishing violations of the right to life exists. The absence of the rule of law is evident in at least two respects.

1. Tradition of impunity
45. As in the past, the fact that persons responsible for violations of the right to life can be certain of impunity is the chief reason for the current renewed phenomenon of summary executions. Evidence of this state of affairs has been noted on numerous occasions: political-party militias who set up roadblocks in the vicinity of army posts make identity checks in defiance of the law and commit acts of violence against passersby; soldiers who strangled a civilian in broad daylight in front of Kigali Central Post Office on 9 March 1993 calmly walked away once the crime had been committed; crowds whipped up by agitators threatened honest local authority representatives attempting to intervene in ethnically-motivated massacres; murder suspects have been released following death threats against certain representatives of the authorities, etc.

46. As Federico Andreu wrote in his foreword to a study by the Economic and Social Council on impunity, "Impunity creeps into every area of the society, undermines political life, destroys social textures, annuls democratic coexistence among peoples and individuals and consecrates the law of silence as the supreme norm for survival. Finally, impunity assures a reproduction of [page 15] injustice in all. Its forms and the continuation of the status quo"*. (*Impunity. impunidad, Impunité, International League for the Rights and Liberation of Peoples, Geneva, 1993, p. 7.)  Thus, lessons should be learned from the past: as has been noted in the first part of the report dealing with the history of Rwanda, the country has already experienced many massacres of an ethnic character. Such acts of violence recur periodically, and the persons responsible, who in most cases are known to everyone, go unpunished. The Special Rapporteur became aware in the course of his mission that this situation was part and parcel of everyday life for many Rwandese people, and that ethnic violence had become a practice which, if not accepted, was at least firmly rooted in Rwandese folk memory.

2 . Judicial system
47. Rwanda's judicial system is to a large extent based on the inheritance from the colonial order. It is the serious failings of this system that have made possible the impunity enjoyed by the persons responsible for the killings. The system's failure to function has been noted on many occasions, notably by the national commission set up to assess government officials by order of the Prime Minister on 6 July 1992, which reached the conclusion that many courts were in a state of paralysis. This state of affairs is partly attributable to the lack of resources available for the administration of justice, but chiefly to the lack of political will shown by the authorities in bringing guilty parties to justice, particularly when they are members of the civil service or the army.

48. The legal training given to judges is far from satisfactory. It may be noted, for instance, that out of 659 judges, only 34 have studied law at an advanced level, and that none of the cantonal court judges have any legal training. In addition, out of 84 government procurators, only 18 hold degrees in law. These weaknesses have a considerable influence on the quality of justice in Rwanda. They also provide a loophole for accused persons, whose lawyers (when they have any) can easily invoke faults in procedure as grounds for having their clients released. Such failings make judges more susceptible to corruption and to interference by the executive in the administration of justice. It may be noted that article 86 of the Constitution of the Rwandese Republic (Journal officiel of 10 June 1991) states that "the President of the Republic is the guarantor of the independence of the judiciary". However, the joint statement of 7 April 1993 admits that "Concerning the Rwandese judicial system, it should be emphasized that it has enormous difficulties in functioning, as a result of inadequate human and material resources and interference by the political and administrative authorities".

49. It should also be noted that the fundamental principle of the irremovability of judges, a principle which guarantees their independence, is not respected. Attention was drawn to this shortcoming by the commission set up to assess government officials, which also stated that the Higher Judicial Council did not play its proper role as "guarantor of the independence of the judiciary because it is not democratically constituted".

[page 16] 50. In addition, the inadequacy of resources made available makes it virtually impossible for the system to function properly: this applies to all stages of the proceedings, whether it be the arrest of suspects, the preliminary investigation or the pre-trial proceedings. For instance, there have been reports of plaintiffs who have had to bring officials writing paper and carbon paper to enable them to do their work. The authorities whom we met repeatedly said that this state of affairs was accounted for by the country's poverty. In the opinion of the Special Rapporteur, the genuine economic problems from which Rwanda is suffering are only a mask to hide a lack of political will on the part of certain authorities to make the judicial system capable of fulfilling its function.

51. The lack of a Minister of Justice makes it difficult to remedy this situation. In fact, the previous Minister, who was a member of an opposition party, resigned after a few months in office, discouraged by the way his work was being hindered by lack of cooperation on the part of the police and the systematic deficiencies in the resources made available to him, both materially and politically. Since January 1993, no successor has received the endorsement of the President of the Republic.

52. The absence of any properly-constituted system of military tribunals is also to be regretted. In this connection, one of the conclusions in the joint statement is that "The Government has decided to establish a military prosecutor's department in order to speed up the examination of cases involving members of the armed forces". However, no details are given as to when this institution is to be set up.

53.  If justice is to be done, there is also need for the defence to be capable of performing its task. There are only about 40 lawyers in Rwanda, and no bar association. Accordingly, almost anyone can claim to be "an attorney at law". As a result, a high proportion of accused persons are not assisted during their trial or receive only very poor assistance.

54. The few inquiries that have been conducted into violations of the right to life have only been partial. They have led not to appropriate convictions, but at most to a few penalties of an administrative nature, such as the suspension of certain mayors. In other cases, persons arrested following massacres have been held in prison only briefly, before being released without trial, on account of procedural irregularities or lack of political will.

B. Absence of any system for the protection of ethnic minorities

55. Despite the terrible lessons to be learned from the country's recent history, no effective system for the prevention of ethnically-motivated massacres has been set up. There are no real police in the over-populated rural areas; at most, there are one or two local officials, who would be incapable of facing up to a rampaging mob. Nor is there any effective warning system within reach of ethnic minorities themselves or their representatives. In fact, everything is left to the diligence of local government officials, who, as has been seen on repeated occasions, are often accomplices in the massacres or even instigate them. The political and administrative commission [page 17] which investigated the disturbances in the prefectures of Gisenyi, Ruhengeri and Kibuye even noted that the region's telephone system had suddenly "broken down" at the time of the events of January 1993, and had "curiously" become operational again without any need for repairs.

C. Injurious propaganda

56. The involvement of the media in spreading unfounded rumours and in exacerbating ethnic problems has been noted on repeated occasions. Radio Rwanda, which is the only source of information for the majority of a poorly educated population, and which is still under the direct control of the President, has played a pernicious role in instigating several massacres. This is particularly true of certain broadcasts in Kinyarwanda which differ markedly in content from news programmes broadcast in French, which is understood only by a small part of the population.

57. The Special Rapporteur had proof of this discrepancy during his mission to Rwanda. He noted that the content of news programmes broadcast on Radio Rwanda and on national television differed substantially, depending on whether the listener was receiving the French version or the version in Kinyarwanda. He also found that the two different language versions of reports of the press conference he had given in order to put an end to rumours concerning the objectives of his mission contradicted one another.

58. It should be emphasized that although all the factors contributing to human rights violations described above have been exacerbated by the state of war, the economic crisis and the political rivalries rife in Rwanda, the restoration of peace will not be sufficient to eliminate them. Indeed, there can be no real peace or stability unless all these contributing factors are eradicated systematically and for good.


59. The Special Rapporteur's recommendations are based on the lessons he learned from his visit to Rwanda and are to a large extent derived from the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions set forth in the annex to Economic and Social Council resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989, and endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly in resolution 44/162 of 15 December 1989 (see annex III) .

60. These recommendations take as their starting-point the principle that although their country is poor and overpopulated and they are exposed to all the evils of underdevelopment, Rwandese citizens, whatever their ethnic group, political affiliation or social origin, have the same fundamental rights as all other citizens throughout the world. There is no reason why their lives should not be as precious and well protected as the lives of citizens of the Netherlands, for example.

61. The international community cannot remain indifferent to their situation and must therefore provide its assistance wherever that of the Rwandese State is inadequate or non-existent. In addition, human rights must be the prime concern of any system for monitoring or implementing the agreements to be concluded by OAU or the United Nations. Human rights must also be at the heart of any transition system introduced after the conclusion of the Arusha peace agreements and must be the subject of a specific and effective programme. This programme might be based on the proposals made in the joint statement by the President of the Republic and the Prime Minister, a statement which has not for the moment given rise to any practical measures.

62. The Special Rapporteur intends to follow closely the action taken on his recommendations by the Rwandese authorities. To this end, he will continue to correspond with the Government, and will transmit to it, in accordance with established procedure, the numerous specific allegations of extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions received before, during and after his mission. He is also considering the possibility of conducting a follow-up mission, with the agreement of the Rwandese authorities, in order to see for himself how the situation has developed.

63. Each of the 12 sections below represents one recommendation, accompanied by commentaries and conclusions.

1. Mechanism for the protection of civilian populations against massacres
64. A mechanism for the protection of civilian populations against massacres should immediately be set up, in terms of both prevention (see recommendations made below) and monitoring and intervention in cases of violence.

65. According to reports, in some cases of intercommunal violence the alarm was given late and the security forces did not act to end the confrontations until several days later. Too often, measures were taken to end the violence only after human rights associations and journalists had alerted public opinion. In some cases, the delay was deliberate, in order to allow the situation to worsen; in others, it was due to failures in the communications systems and poor coordination of services. In the latter cases, those inadequacies should be corrected by setting up a system for sending information rapidly from the place where the violence is occurring directly to the security service responsible for taking action, if possible as soon as the first signs of difficulty appear, for example, by setting up a radio link. To this end, international teams of human rights observers and a civilian police force might be established, particularly in the high-risk areas; with the agreement of the Rwandese authorities, they would be placed under international supervision. The teams would enjoy the immunities and guarantees necessary in order to perform their function and would be stationed in the country until a national system could effectively take over.

66. However, if these measures are to be meaningful, the security service responsible for taking action once the alarm is given should have the means to do so effectively. This would involve more material resources (especially vehicles and fuel), more staff and staff who are better trained, especially in human rights and techniques for maintaining order. Technical cooperation in the framework of development assistance might be used for this purpose; France is already playing a not insignificant role in the training and supervision of [page 19] the police. It should be noted that measures have been taken to make the police more effective in intervening during intercommunal violence. These efforts must be pursued and supported in order to provide the means for them to intervene effectively in situations of violence.

2 . Support for Rwandese non-governmental organizations directly involved in the protection of human rights
67. Outstanding work has been done by some of the Rwandese non-governmental organizations involved in the protection of human rights (Association Rwandaise pour la Défense des Droits de l'Homme (ARDNO) , Association Rwandaise pour les Droits de la Personne et des Libertés Publiques (ADL) , Association des Volontaires de la Paix (AVP), Ligue Chrétienne de Défense des Droits de I'Homme au Rwanda (LICHREDHOR) and Association pour la Promotion de l'Union par la Justice Sociale (KANYARWANDA). The members of these NGOs are all too often the only people to act, at the risk of their lives, to investigate human rights violations, bring pressure to bear on the authorities and report the culprits. These courageous efforts should therefore be stimulated and supported; the NGOs should be given material means and training opportunities in order to strengthen their activity, and especially their role in detecting the early signs of intercommunal violence. Their presence in the field and their professionalism should therefore be increased. The highest priority, however, is to ensure their protection, so that the intimidation, death threats and attacks against members are brought to an end. These remarks and recommendations also apply to certain journalists who risk their lives to report human rights violations.

3 . National reconciliation campaign
68. A national reconciliation campaign should be organized in order to attempt to eliminate the negative effects in people's minds of the odious disinformation advocating ethnic and political intolerance, hatred and violence which has been disseminated in the past. This campaign should begin with a solemn, public commitment, in French and Kinyarwanda, by the Head of State, the Head of Government, the leaders of all the political parties and the religious authorities to adopt a policy of non-discrimination, national unity and respect for human rights, particularly the right to life and the right to peace. This should be followed by the setting-up of public education programmes in the media to make the population more aware of human rights principles and the need to combat ethnic discrimination. These measures should be taken at the national level, but in-depth work should be undertaken in each community. Special attention-should be given to raising the awareness of persons displaced by war. International and national standards protecting human rights and the rights of minorities should be publicized in the appropriate language and form. Particular reference should be made to commission on Human Rights resolution 1993/24 of 5 March 1993, entitled "Rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities" and to General Assembly resolution 47/136 of 18 December 1992, entitled "Summary or arbitrary executions".

 [page 20] 4. Media-related action
69. The propaganda mentioned above has sometimes been disseminated via the national radio station, which is still directly responsible to the Office of the President and not the Ministry of Information. In this connection, a reform of the role and structure of the media should be envisaged. Journalists have already begun to study this question and have adopted a code of ethics. They should be provided with training opportunities, in order to enhance their professionalism and eliminate any lingering partisan tendencies. The Minister for Information is also attempting to effect reforms, but his powers are limited and his action too often thwarted.

70. The reform of the media should take place in accordance with the spirit of the Declaration on Fundamental Principles concerning the Contribution of the Mass Media to Strengthening Peace and International Understanding, to the Promotion of Human Rights and to Countering Racialism, Apartheid and Incitement to War, proclaimed on 28 November 1978 at the twentieth session of the General Conference of UNESCO. The ensuing creation of free radio stations should also conform to these principles. Lack of respect for these principles has already caused too much loss of human life.

5. Reform of the Rwandese Judicial system
71. There is an urgent need for radical reform of the Rwandese judicial system. The training of judges and court officers is vital, as is the allocation of the practical means necessary for the functioning of justice. But above all, the prerequisite for the necessary changes is a new attitude on the part of the authorities. Without political will at the top, no real reform is conceivable. The following are among the measures recommended:

(a) Recruitment of new judges to be limited to persona holding a law degree, who should be given adequate mean and career guarantees;
(b) Judges, especially judges who are not jurists and auxiliary judges, to be given training and refresher courses;
(c) A programme to be devised for equipping the courts and government procurator's offices and renovating their premises;
(d) A human rights training programme to be devised for the judicial police, whose effective subordination to the judiciary should be ensured;
(e) Introduction of a system for the irremovability of judges and effective implementation of the reform of the Higher Judicial Council;
(f) A free and independent bar association, open only to holders of a law degree, should be established;
[page 21]
(g) Code of Criminal Procedure to be revised in order to permit the installation of an examining magistrate who is independent and separate from the government procurator's office, which should be under the authority of the Minister of Justice;
(h) Code of Criminal Procedure to be revised in order to enable victims or their representatives to institute criminal proceedings, even if the government procurator rejects the case, by going directly before the examining magistrate or the trial court.
6. Death penalty
72. Imposition of the death penalty should be suspended until the judicial system affords minimum guarantees of professionalism, impartiality and independence, within the meaning of the standards embodied in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Pending suspension, the presence of a qualified lawyer should be obligatory whenever an accused person appears in court on a charge that is liable to give rise to the death penalty. Death sentences already handed down should be commuted impartial and objective inquiry into the allegations of massacres committed by the Rwandese Patriotic Front

73. An impartial and objective inquiry into the allegations of massacres committed by the FPR is essential if this matter is to be fully clarified. Many grey areas remain, making all kinds of speculation possible. For the inquiry to be thorough, it should also cover Ugandan territory, in order to verify the charges against the PPR, in particular those involving deportations of civilians to Uganda.

8. Dismantling of all violent organizations
74. All violent organizations should be dismantled as a matter of urgency. Criminal organizations such as the "death squads", "Amasasu" or "Network Zero", must be identified and dismantled, and their members prosecuted, whatever their rank. The same measures must be taken against the political-party militias that have perpetrated human rights violations. It should be noted that article 4 of the Political Parties Act of 18 June 1991 (Journal officiel 1 July 1991) explicitly prohibits the establishment of militias or other organizations using similar methods". All weapons in circulation among the population or distributed to it by certain authorities should be confiscated as a matter of urgency. In the current situation of extreme poverty, criminality and tension, one spark is all that is needed to cause the situation to degenerate.

9. Combating impunity and compensating victims
75. In general, thorough judicial inquiries (and administrative inquiries, if necessary), embodying all guarantees of objectivity and impartiality, should be conducted by qualified professionals provided with adequate means, in each case of violation of the right to life. Complainants, witnesses, the persons heading the inquiries and their families will have to be protected against violence or any other form of intimidation. All officials who are legitimate [page 22] suspects and capable of impeding the inquiry because of their position or function should be suspended. The conclusions of these investigations should be made public, and all those responsible prosecuted. The families of the victims of violations should be given material assistance, and equitable compensation if necessary, within a reasonable period of time. To this end, an assistance programme and fund should be established. Thorough inquiries, with the assistance of teams of specialists in medicine, archaeology and legal anthropology, should be opened into all allegations of mass graves, whether attributed to the Rwandese Armed Forces, the FPR or civilian populations.

76. In describing the need to end the vicious circle of impunity by rendering justice to the victims and their families, some of the people with whom the Special Rapporteur spoke mentioned the need for "drastic surgery" in order to bring about genuine national reconciliation and eliminate the spectre of a recurrence of the massacres. The country's history does not seem to show that the massacres of the past have gone unpunished and that the population has, as it were, accepted that sad situation, without drawing the necessary conclusions. History now seems to be repeating itself, and the errors of the past should be avoided.

10. Ending arbitrary arrests and detentions
77. Arbitrary arrests and detentions and unacknowledged detentions must be stopped and those responsible for such violations punished. These are the violations that foster and pave the way for summary executions. Despite the assurances he was given by the competent authorities during his mission to Rwanda, the Special Rapporteur has in fact received allegations indicating that civilian are still being held in military camps.

11. The genocide question
78. The question whether the massacres described above may be termed genocide has often been raised. It is not for the Special Rapporteur to pass judgement at this stage, but an initial reply may be put forward. Rwanda acceded to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on 15 April 1975. Article II of the Convention reads:

"in the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another [page 23] group.

79. The cases of intercommunal violence brought to the Special Rapporteur's attention indicate very clearly that the victims of the attacks, Tutsis in the overwhelming majority of cases, have been targeted solely because of their membership of a certain ethnic group, and for no other objective reason. Article II, paragraphs (a) and (b), might therefore be considered to apply to these cases.

80. The violations of the right to life, as described in this report, could fall within the purview of article III of the convention, which reads:

"The following acts shall be punishable:

(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide. 

81. Similarly, article IV states: "Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts ... shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals".

12. Additional measures for protection of the right to life and restoring a lasting peace

(a) Preparations for demobilizing military personnel
82. Once peace has been restored, a large number of military personnel will have to be demobilized, within both the Rwandese Armed Forces and the FPR. Preparations for their reintegration into the socioeconomic life of the country should not be left until that time; many of these men were unemployed youngsters who enlisted because the army gave them the possibility of eating. According to reports, some of the recruits were also delinquents. In view of the fact that all these persons have learned how to handle weapons and that it has also become very easy to obtain weapons, there is a danger that some will turn to crime if their return to civilian life goes badly. There has already been a sharp increase in armed attacks, especially with grenades.

(b) Preparations for the return of persons displaced by the war; mine clearance operations
83. Preparations for peace must include measures for the rapid return home of persons displaced by the war. Sufficient guarantees for their security must be given by the two parties to the conflict, and the combat zones must be cleared of mines. Rwanda should accordingly be provided with technical assistance for mine clearance; it is vital to reduce the dangers to the [page 24] displaced persons as far as possible when they return to their land; in addition, experience has shown that the victims of these instruments of death are all too often children. Similarly, the displaced persons should be the beneficiaries of a special assistance programme to enable them to resume their activities rapidly. The Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the question of internally-displaced persons might perhaps be invited by the Rwandese authorities to visit the country. Assistance programmes should also be planned for refugees abroad, who might be returning as a result of the Arusha negotiations.

(c) New identity card
84. The Minister of the Interior told the special Rapporteur that the Rwandese identity card, which, as we have already seen (para. 13), specifies the holder's ethnic group should as from June 1993 be exchanged for a new version containing no ethnic reference; he further explained that this had not been done earlier because of lack of finance. This indispensable reform should be carried out as soon as possible.

(d) Public statements by the Head of State
85. The joint statement of 7 April 1993 (see annex II) is a positive step that should be welcomed and should be repeated whenever the human rights situation so requires. The President of the Republic, whom article 39 of the Constitution of 30 May 1991 makes the guarantor of national unity, should play a leading and unequivocal role in the protection of human rights and in national reconciliation. He should, in particular, make public statements to convince the Rwandese that human rights violations will no longer be tolerated, urge the population to report abuses to the appropriate authorities and ensure that the alleged culprits are in fact brought to justice.

(e) Establishment of a national human rights commission
86. A national human rights commission should be set up. It should, in particular:

(i) Be established by means of a law and have competence to deal with any allegation of a human rights violation;
(ii) Have an image of credibility and impartiality;
(iii) Ensure the immunity of its members and the protection of complainants and witnesses;
(iv) Be given adequate powers of investigation respective of the alleged culprit and the power to make surprise visits to places of detention, including military camps;
(v)  Be given adequate and well-trained staff;
(vi)  Enforce national and international standards;
(vii) Be capable of instituting legal proceedings;
[page 25]
(viii) Have the power to make recommendations to all authorities;
(ix) Have offices throughout the country;
(x) Ensure the promotion and dissemination of human rights standards among the population, in particular through radio programmes in Kinyarwanda.

This commission might be partially financed by international aid. Special technical assistance might also be provided by the Advisory Services, Technical Assistance and Information Branch of the Centre for Human Rights in Geneva.

 [Annexes not included]

Home | Prevention | UN docs | Whitaker Report 1985 |
Ndiaye Report on Rwanda 1993
| Rwanda Genocide 10th Anniversary Resolution
Stockholm Proposals | Kofi Annan's 2004 Action Plan to Prevent Genocide

Prevent Genocide International